主页EIPs周刊
EIPsEIP-7594
EIP-7594

PeerDAS - Peer Data Availability Sampling

Introducing simple DAS utilizing gossip distribution and peer requests
ReviewStandards Track: Networking
创建时间: 2024-01-12
关联 EIP: EIP-4844
Danny Ryan (@djrtwo), Dankrad Feist (@dankrad), Francesco D'Amato (@fradamt), Hsiao-Wei Wang (@hwwhww)
社区讨论原文链接编辑
1 分钟了解
欢迎补充好内容
去提交
相关视频
欢迎补充好内容
去提交
正文

Abstract

PeerDAS (Peer Data Availability Sampling) is a networking protocol that allows beacon nodes to perform data availability sampling (DAS) to ensure that blob data has been made available while downloading only a subset of the data. PeerDAS utilizes gossip for distribution, discovery for finding peers of particular data custody, and peer requests for sampling.

Motivation

DAS is a method of scaling data availability beyond the levels of EIP-4844 by not requiring all nodes to download all data while still ensuring that all of the data has been made available.

Providing additional data availability helps bring scale to Ethereum users in the context of layer 2 systems called "roll-ups" whose dominant bottleneck is layer 1 data availability.

Specification

We extend the blobs introduced in EIP-4844 using a one-dimensional erasure coding extension. Each row consists of the blob data combined with its erasure code. It is subdivided into cells, which are the smallest units that can be authenticated with their respective blob's KZG commitments. Each column, associated with a specific gossip subnet, consists of the cells from all rows for a specific index. Each node is responsible for maintaining and custodying a deterministic set of column subnets and data as a function of their node ID.

Nodes find and maintain a diverse peer set and sample columns from their peers to perform DAS every slot.

A node can reconstruct the entire data matrix if it acquires at least 50% of all the columns. If a node has less than 50%, it can request the necessary columns from the peer nodes.

The detailed specifications are on ethereum/consensus-specs.

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.

Rationale

TBD

Backwards Compatibility

Test Cases

Reference Implementation

Security Considerations

Needs discussion.

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

扩展阅读
欢迎补充好内容
去提交

不想错过最新的 EIP 动态?

订阅 EIPs Fun 周刊以跟进相关更新,建⽴你与 EIP 之间的连接 ,更好地建设以太坊。

详情
支持以太坊贡献者,推动生态建设
资源
GitHub
支持社区