HomeEIPs
EIPsERC-6120
ERC-6120

Universal Token Router

A single router contract enables tokens to be sent to application contracts in the transfer-and-call pattern instead of approve-then-call.
ReviewStandards Track: ERC
Created: 2022-12-12
Requires: EIP-20, EIP-165, EIP-721, EIP-1014, EIP-1155
Derivable (@derivable-labs), Zergity (@Zergity), Ngo Quang Anh (@anhnq82), BerlinP (@BerlinP), Khanh Pham (@blackskin18), Hal Blackburn (@h4l)
DiscussionsOriginal linkEdit
1 min read

Video
Anyone may contribute to propose contents.
Go propose
Original

Abstract

ETH is designed with transfer-and-call as the default behavior in a transaction. Unfortunately, ERC-20 is not designed with that pattern in mind and newer standards cannot apply to the token contracts that have already been deployed.

Application and router contracts must use the approve-then-call pattern, which costs additional $n\times m\times l$ approve (or permit) signatures for $n$ contracts, $m$ tokens, and $l$ accounts. Not only these allowance transactions create a bad user experience, cost a lot of user fees and network storage, but they also put users at serious security risks as they often have to approve unaudited, unverified, and upgradable proxy contracts. The approve-then-call pattern is also quite error-prone, as many allowance-related bugs and exploits have been found recently.

The Universal Token Router (UTR) separates the token allowance from the application logic, allowing any token to be spent in a contract call the same way with ETH, without approving any other application contracts.

Tokens approved to the Universal Token Router can only be spent in transactions directly signed by their owner, and they have clearly visible token transfer behavior, including token types (ETH, ERC-20, ERC-721 or ERC-1155), amountIn, amountOutMin, and recipient.

The Universal Token Router contract is deployed using the EIP-1014 SingletonFactory contract at a single address across all EVM-compatible networks. This enables new token contracts to pre-configure it as a trusted spender, eliminating the need for approval transactions during their interactive usage.

Motivation

When users approve their tokens to a contract, they trust that:

  • it only spends the tokens with their permission (from msg.sender or ecrecover)
  • it does not use delegatecall (e.g. upgradable proxies)

By ensuring the same security conditions above, the Universal Token Router can be shared by all interactive applications, saving most approval transactions for old tokens and ALL approval transactions for new tokens.

Before this EIP, when users sign transactions to spend their approved tokens, they trust the front-end code entirely to construct those transactions honestly and correctly. This puts them at great risk of phishing sites.

The Universal Token Router function arguments can act as a manifest for users when signing a transaction. With the support from wallets, users can see and review their expected token behavior instead of blindly trusting the application contracts and front-end code. Phishing sites will be much easier to detect and avoid for users.

Most of the application contracts are already compatible with the Universal Token Router and can use it to have the following benefits:

  • Securely share the user token allowance with all other applications.
  • Update their peripheral contracts as often as they want.
  • Save development and security audit costs on router contracts.

The Universal Token Router promotes the security-by-result model in decentralized applications instead of security-by-process. By directly querying token balance change for output verification, user transactions can be secured even when interacting with erroneous or malicious contracts. With non-token results, application helper contracts can provide additional result-checking functions for UTR's output verification.

Specification

The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “NOT RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.

The main interface of the UTR contract:

interface IUniversalTokenRouter { function exec( Output[] memory outputs, Action[] memory actions ) payable; }

Output Verification

Output defines the expected token balance change for verification.

struct Output { address recipient; uint eip; // token standard: 0 for ETH or EIP number address token; // token contract address uint id; // token id for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 uint amountOutMin; }

Token balances of the recipient address are recorded at the beginning and the end of the exec function for each item in outputs. Transaction will revert with INSUFFICIENT_OUTPUT_AMOUNT if any of the balance changes are less than its amountOutMin.

A special id ERC_721_BALANCE is reserved for ERC-721, which can be used in output actions to verify the total amount of all ids owned by the recipient address.

ERC_721_BALANCE = keccak256('UniversalTokenRouter.ERC_721_BALANCE')

Action

Action defines the token inputs and the contract call.

struct Action { Input[] inputs; address code; // contract code address bytes data; // contract input data }

The action code contract MUST implement the ERC-165 interface with the ID 0x61206120 in order to be called by the UTR. This interface check prevents direct invocation of token allowance-spending functions (e.g., transferFrom) by the UTR. Therefore, new token contracts MUST NOT implement this interface ID.

abstract contract NotToken is ERC165 { // IERC165-supportsInterface function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view virtual override returns (bool) { return interfaceId == 0x61206120 || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } } contract Application is NotToken { // this contract can be used with the UTR }

Input

Input defines the input token to transfer or prepare before the action contract is executed.

struct Input { uint mode; address recipient; uint eip; // token standard: 0 for ETH or EIP number address token; // token contract address uint id; // token id for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 uint amountIn; }

mode takes one of the following values:

  • PAYMENT = 0: pend a payment for the token to be transferred from msg.sender to the recipient by calling UTR.pay from anywhere in the same transaction.
  • TRANSFER = 1: transfer the token directly from msg.sender to the recipient.
  • CALL_VALUE = 2: record the ETH amount to pass to the action as the call value.

Each input in the inputs argument is processed sequentially. For simplicity, duplicated PAYMENT and CALL_VALUE inputs are valid, but only the last amountIn value is used.

Payment Input

PAYMENT is the recommended mode for application contracts that use the transfer-in-callback pattern. E.g., flashloan contracts, Uniswap/v3-core, Derivable, etc.

For each Input with PAYMENT mode, at most amountIn of the token can be transferred from msg.sender to the recipient by calling UTR.pay from anywhere in the same transaction.

UTR
 |
 | PAYMENT
 | (payments pended for UTR.pay)
 |
 |                                  Application Contracts
action.code.call ---------------------> |
                                        |
UTR.pay <----------------------- (call) |
                                        |
 | <-------------------------- (return) |
 |
 | (clear all pending payments)
 |
END

Token's allowance and PAYMENT are essentially different as:

  • allowance: allow a specific spender to transfer the token to anyone at any time.
  • PAYMENT: allow anyone to transfer the token to a specific recipient only in that transaction.
Spend Payment
interface IUniversalTokenRouter { function pay(bytes memory payment, uint amount); }

To call pay, the payment param must be encoded as follows:

payment = abi.encode( payer, // address recipient, // address eip, // uint256 token, // address id // uint256 );

The payment bytes can also be used by adapter UTR contracts to pass contexts and payloads for performing custom payment logic.

Discard Payment

Sometimes, it's useful to discard the payment instead of performing the transfer, for example, when the application contract wants to burn its own token from payment.payer. The following function can be used to verify the payment to the caller's address and discard a portion of it.

interface IUniversalTokenRouter { function discard(bytes memory payment, uint amount); }

Please refer to the Discard Payment section in the Security Considerations for an important security note.

Payment Lifetime

Payments are recorded in the UTR storage and intended to be spent by input.action external calls only within that transaction. All payment storages will be cleared before the UTR.exec ends.

Native Token Tranfer

The UTR SHOULD have a receive() function for user execution logic that requires transferring ETH in. The msg.value transferred into the router can be spent in multiple inputs across different actions. While the caller takes full responsibility for the movement of ETH in and out of the router, the exec function SHOULD refund any remaining ETH before the function ends.

Please refer to the Reentrancy section in the Security Considerations for information on reentrancy risks and mitigation.

Usage Examples

Uniswap V2 Router

Legacy function:

UniswapV2Router01.swapExactTokensForTokens( uint amountIn, uint amountOutMin, address[] calldata path, address to, uint deadline )

UniswapV2Helper01.swapExactTokensForTokens is a modified version of it without the token transfer part.

This transaction is signed by users to execute the swap instead of the legacy function:

UniversalTokenRouter.exec([{ recipient: to, eip: 20, token: path[path.length-1], id: 0, amountOutMin, }], [{ inputs: [{ mode: TRANSFER, recipient: UniswapV2Library.pairFor(factory, path[0], path[1]), eip: 20, token: path[0], id: 0, amountIn: amountIn, }], code: UniswapV2Helper01.address, data: encodeFunctionData("swapExactTokensForTokens", [ amountIn, amountOutMin, path, to, deadline, ]), }])

Uniswap V3 Router

Legacy router contract:

contract SwapRouter { // this function is called by pool to pay the input tokens function pay( address token, address payer, address recipient, uint256 value ) internal { ... // pull payment TransferHelper.safeTransferFrom(token, payer, recipient, value); } }

The helper contract to use with the UTR:

contract SwapHelper { // this function is called by pool to pay the input tokens function pay( address token, address payer, address recipient, uint256 value ) internal { ... // pull payment bytes memory payment = abi.encode(payer, recipient, 20, token, 0); UTR.pay(payment, value); } }

This transaction is signed by users to execute the exactInput functionality using PAYMENT mode:

UniversalTokenRouter.exec([{ eip: 20, token: tokenOut, id: 0, amountOutMin: 1, recipient: to, }], [{ inputs: [{ mode: PAYMENT, eip: 20, token: tokenIn, id: 0, amountIn: amountIn, recipient: pool.address, }], code: SwapHelper.address, data: encodeFunctionData("exactInput", [...]), }])

Allowance Adapter

A simple non-reentrancy ERC-20 adapter for aplication and router contracts that use direct allowance.

contract AllowanceAdapter is ReentrancyGuard { struct Input { address token; uint amountIn; } function approveAndCall( Input[] memory inputs, address spender, bytes memory data, address leftOverRecipient ) external payable nonReentrant { for (uint i = 0; i < inputs.length; ++i) { Input memory input = inputs[i]; IERC20(input.token).approve(spender, input.amountIn); } (bool success, bytes memory result) = spender.call{value: msg.value}(data); if (!success) { assembly { revert(add(result, 32), mload(result)) } } for (uint i = 0; i < inputs.length; ++i) { Input memory input = inputs[i]; // clear all allowance IERC20(input.token).approve(spender, 0); uint leftOver = IERC20(input.token).balanceOf(address(this)); if (leftOver > 0) { TransferHelper.safeTransfer(input.token, leftOverRecipient, leftOver); } } } }

This transaction is constructed to utilize the UTR to interact with Uniswap V2 Router without approving any token to it:

const { data: routerData } = await uniswapRouter.populateTransaction.swapExactTokensForTokens( amountIn, amountOutMin, path, to, deadline, ) const { data: adapterData } = await adapter.populateTransaction.approveAndCall( [{ token: path[0], amountIn, }], uniswapRouter.address, routerData, leftOverRecipient, ) await utr.exec([], [{ inputs: [{ mode: TRANSFER, recipient: adapter.address, eip: 20, token: path[0], id: 0, amountIn, }], code: adapter.address, data: adapterData, }])

Rationale

The Permit type signature is not supported since the purpose of the Universal Token Router is to eliminate all interactive approve signatures for new tokens, and most for old tokens.

Backwards Compatibility

Tokens

Old token contracts (ERC-20, ERC-721 and ERC-1155) require approval for the Universal Token Router once for each account.

New token contracts can pre-configure the Universal Token Router as a trusted spender, and no approval transaction is required for interactive usage.

Applications

The only application contracts INCOMPATIBLE with the UTR are contracts that use msg.sender as the beneficiary address in their internal storage without any function for ownership transfer.

All application contracts that accept recipient (or to) argument as the beneficiary address are compatible with the UTR out of the box.

Application contracts that transfer tokens (ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155) to msg.sender need additional adapters to add a recipient to their functions.

// sample adapter contract for WETH contract WethAdapter { function deposit(address recipient) external payable { IWETH(WETH).deposit(){value: msg.value}; TransferHelper.safeTransfer(WETH, recipient, msg.value); } }

Additional helper and adapter contracts might be needed, but they're mostly peripheral and non-intrusive. They don't hold any tokens or allowances, so they can be frequently updated and have little to no security impact on the core application contracts.

Reference Implementation

A reference implementation by Derivable Labs, verified by Hacken.

/// @title The implemetation of the EIP-6120. /// @author Derivable Labs contract UniversalTokenRouter is ERC165, IUniversalTokenRouter { uint256 constant PAYMENT = 0; uint256 constant TRANSFER = 1; uint256 constant CALL_VALUE = 2; uint256 constant EIP_ETH = 0; uint256 constant ERC_721_BALANCE = uint256(keccak256('UniversalTokenRouter.ERC_721_BALANCE')); /// @dev transient pending payments mapping(bytes32 => uint256) t_payments; /// @dev accepting ETH for user execution (e.g. WETH.withdraw) receive() external payable {} /// The main entry point of the router /// @param outputs token behaviour for output verification /// @param actions router actions and inputs for execution function exec( Output[] memory outputs, Action[] memory actions ) external payable virtual override { unchecked { // track the expected balances before any action is executed for (uint256 i = 0; i < outputs.length; ++i) { Output memory output = outputs[i]; uint256 balance = _balanceOf(output); uint256 expected = output.amountOutMin + balance; require(expected >= balance, 'UTR: OUTPUT_BALANCE_OVERFLOW'); output.amountOutMin = expected; } address sender = msg.sender; for (uint256 i = 0; i < actions.length; ++i) { Action memory action = actions[i]; uint256 value; for (uint256 j = 0; j < action.inputs.length; ++j) { Input memory input = action.inputs[j]; uint256 mode = input.mode; if (mode == CALL_VALUE) { // eip and id are ignored value = input.amountIn; } else { if (mode == PAYMENT) { bytes32 key = keccak256(abi.encode(sender, input.recipient, input.eip, input.token, input.id)); t_payments[key] = input.amountIn; } else if (mode == TRANSFER) { _transferToken(sender, input.recipient, input.eip, input.token, input.id, input.amountIn); } else { revert('UTR: INVALID_MODE'); } } } if (action.code != address(0) || action.data.length > 0 || value > 0) { require( ERC165Checker.supportsInterface(action.code, 0x61206120), "UTR: NOT_CALLABLE" ); (bool success, bytes memory result) = action.code.call{value: value}(action.data); if (!success) { assembly { revert(add(result,32),mload(result)) } } } // clear all transient storages for (uint256 j = 0; j < action.inputs.length; ++j) { Input memory input = action.inputs[j]; if (input.mode == PAYMENT) { // transient storages bytes32 key = keccak256(abi.encodePacked( sender, input.recipient, input.eip, input.token, input.id )); delete t_payments[key]; } } } // refund any left-over ETH uint256 leftOver = address(this).balance; if (leftOver > 0) { TransferHelper.safeTransferETH(sender, leftOver); } // verify balance changes for (uint256 i = 0; i < outputs.length; ++i) { Output memory output = outputs[i]; uint256 balance = _balanceOf(output); // NOTE: output.amountOutMin is reused as `expected` require(balance >= output.amountOutMin, 'UTR: INSUFFICIENT_OUTPUT_AMOUNT'); } } } /// Spend the pending payment. Intended to be called from the input.action. /// @param payment encoded payment data /// @param amount token amount to pay with payment function pay(bytes memory payment, uint256 amount) external virtual override { discard(payment, amount); ( address sender, address recipient, uint256 eip, address token, uint256 id ) = abi.decode(payment, (address, address, uint256, address, uint256)); _transferToken(sender, recipient, eip, token, id, amount); } /// Discard a part of a pending payment. Can be called from the input.action /// to verify the payment without transfering any token. /// @param payment encoded payment data /// @param amount token amount to pay with payment function discard(bytes memory payment, uint256 amount) public virtual override { bytes32 key = keccak256(payment); require(t_payments[key] >= amount, 'UTR: INSUFFICIENT_PAYMENT'); unchecked { t_payments[key] -= amount; } } // IERC165-supportsInterface function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view virtual override returns (bool) { return interfaceId == type(IUniversalTokenRouter).interfaceId || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } function _transferToken( address sender, address recipient, uint256 eip, address token, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) internal virtual { if (eip == 20) { TransferHelper.safeTransferFrom(token, sender, recipient, amount); } else if (eip == 1155) { IERC1155(token).safeTransferFrom(sender, recipient, id, amount, ""); } else if (eip == 721) { IERC721(token).safeTransferFrom(sender, recipient, id); } else { revert("UTR: INVALID_EIP"); } } function _balanceOf( Output memory output ) internal view virtual returns (uint256 balance) { uint256 eip = output.eip; if (eip == 20) { return IERC20(output.token).balanceOf(output.recipient); } if (eip == 1155) { return IERC1155(output.token).balanceOf(output.recipient, output.id); } if (eip == 721) { if (output.id == ERC_721_BALANCE) { return IERC721(output.token).balanceOf(output.recipient); } try IERC721(output.token).ownerOf(output.id) returns (address currentOwner) { return currentOwner == output.recipient ? 1 : 0; } catch { return 0; } } if (eip == EIP_ETH) { return output.recipient.balance; } revert("UTR: INVALID_EIP"); } }

Security Considerations

ERC-165 Tokens

Token contracts must NEVER support the ERC-165 interface with the ID 0x61206120, as it is reserved for non-token contracts to be called with the UTR. Any token with the interface ID 0x61206120 approved to the UTR can be spent by anyone, without any restrictions.

Reentrancy

Tokens transferred to the UTR contract will be permanently lost, as there is no way to transfer them out. Applications that require an intermediate address to hold tokens should use their own Helper contract with a reentrancy guard for secure execution.

ETH must be transferred to the UTR contracts before the value is spent in an action call (using CALL_VALUE). This ETH value can be siphoned out of the UTR using a re-entrant call inside an action code or rogue token functions. This exploit will not be possible if users don't transfer more ETH than they will spend in that transaction.

// transfer 100 in, but spend only 60, // so at most 40 wei can be exploited in this transaction UniversalTokenRouter.exec([ ... ], [{ inputs: [{ mode: CALL_VALUE, eip: 20, token: 0, id: 0, amountIn: 60, // spend 60 recipient: AddressZero, }], ... }], { value: 100, // transfer 100 in })

Discard Payment

The result of the pay function can be checked by querying the balance after the call, allowing the UTR contract to be called in a trustless manner. However, due to the inability to verify the execution of the discard function, it should only be used with a trusted UTR contract.

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.

Further reading
Anyone may contribute to propose contents.
Go propose
Adopted by projects
Anyone may contribute to propose contents.
Go propose

Not miss a beat of EIPs' update?

Subscribe EIPs Fun to receive the latest updates of EIPs Good for Buidlers to follow up.

View all
Serve EIP builders, scale Ethereum.
Resources
GitHub
Supported by