Minimal Soulbound NFTs
The ERC-5192 proposal is an extension of the EIP-721 standard for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) on the Ethereum blockchain. It proposes a minimal interface for making tokens "soulbound," meaning they are non-transferrable and bound to a single account. The motivation for this proposal is to provide a standard for socially-priced tokens similar to World of Warcraft's soulbound items, which are non-transferrable and have a personal connection to the owner. The proposal outlines a contract interface for binding a token to a receiving account and specifies that all EIP-721 functions that transfer the token from one account to another must throw. The proposal also includes considerations for backwards compatibility and security. In summary, the ERC-5192 proposal aims to provide a standard for creating soulbound NFTs on the Ethereum blockchain.
Videos
Original
Abstract
This standard is an extension of EIP-721. It proposes a minimal interface to make tokens soulbound using the feature detection functionality of EIP-165. A soulbound token is a non-fungible token bound to a single account.
Motivation
The Ethereum community has expressed a need for non-transferrable, non-fungible, and socially-priced tokens similar to World of Warcraft’s soulbound items. But the lack of a token standard leads many developers to simply throw errors upon a user's invocation of transfer functionalities. Over the long term, this will lead to fragmentation and less composability.
In this document, we outline a minimal addition to EIP-721 that allows wallet implementers to check for a token contract's permanent (non-)transferability using EIP-165.
Specification
The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY" and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
Contract Interface
A token with a uint256 tokenId
may be bound to a receiving account with function locked(...)
returning true
. In this case, all EIP-721 functions of the contract that transfer the token from one account to another must throw.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: CC0-1.0 pragma solidity ^0.8.0; interface IERC5192 { /// @notice Emitted when the locking status is changed to locked. /// @dev If a token is minted and the status is locked, this event should be emitted. /// @param tokenId The identifier for a token. event Locked(uint256 tokenId); /// @notice Emitted when the locking status is changed to unlocked. /// @dev If a token is minted and the status is unlocked, this event should be emitted. /// @param tokenId The identifier for a token. event Unlocked(uint256 tokenId); /// @notice Returns the locking status of an Soulbound Token /// @dev SBTs assigned to zero address are considered invalid, and queries /// about them do throw. /// @param tokenId The identifier for an SBT. function locked(uint256 tokenId) external view returns (bool); }
To aid recognition that an EIP-721 token implements "soulbinding" via this EIP upon calling EIP-721's function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceID) external view returns (bool)
with interfaceID=0xb45a3c0e
, a contract implementing this EIP must return true
.
Rationale
The above model is the simplest possible path towards a canonical interface for Soulbound tokens. It reflects upon the numerous Soulbound token implementations that simply revert upon transfers.
Backwards Compatibility
This proposal is fully backward compatible with EIP-721.
Security Considerations
There are no security considerations related directly to the implementation of this standard.
Copyright
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
Adopted by projects
Not miss a beat of EIPs' update?
Subscribe EIPs Fun to receive the latest updates of EIPs Good for Buidlers to follow up.
View all