EIP-3855 proposes the introduction of a new instruction, PUSH0 (0x5f), which pushes the constant value 0 onto the stack in Ethereum bytecode. The motivation for this change is to reduce contract code size, reduce the risk of contracts misusing various instructions as an optimization measure, and reduce the need to use DUP instructions for duplicating zeroes. The cost of this instruction is 2 gas, and there are no known security considerations.
PEEPanEIP#66: EIP-3855: PUSH0 instruction with Alex Beregszaszi, Hugo De la cruz, Paweł Bylica
0x5f) instruction, which pushes the constant value 0 onto the stack.
Many instructions expect offsets as inputs, which in a number of cases are zero. A good example is the return data parameters of
CALLs, which are set to zeroes in case the contract prefers using
RETURNDATA*. This is only one example, but there are many other reasons why a contract would need to push a zero value. They can achieve that today by
PUSH1 0, which costs 3 gas at runtime, and is encoded as two bytes which means
2 * 200 gas deployment cost.
Because of the overall cost many try to use various other instructions to achieve the same effect. Common examples include
SELFBALANCE. Some of these cost only 2 gas and are a single byte long, but their value can depend on the context.
We have conducted an analysis on Mainnet (block ranges 8,567,259…8,582,058 and 12,205,970…12,817,405), and ~11.5% of all the
PUSH* instructions executed push a value of zero.
The main motivations for this change include:
- Reducing contract code size.
- Reducing the risk of contracts (mis)using various instructions as an optimisation measure. Repricing/changing those instructions can be more risky.
- Reduce the need to use
DUPinstructions for duplicating zeroes.
To put the "waste" into perspective, across existing accounts 340,557,331 bytes are wasted on
PUSH1 00 instructions, which means 68,111,466,200 gas was spent to deploy them. In practice a lot of these accounts share identical bytecode with others, so their total stored size in clients is lower, however the deploy time cost must have been paid nevertheless.
An example for 2) is changing the behaviour of
RETURNDATASIZE such that it may not be guaranteed to be zero at the beginning of the call frame.
PUSH0 is introduced at
0x5f. It has no immediate data, pops no items from the stack, and places a single item with the value 0 onto the stack. The cost of this instruction is 2 gas (aka
base gas cost is used for instructions which place constant values onto the stack, such as
ORIGIN, and so forth.
0x5f means it is in a "contiguous" space with the rest of the
PUSH implementations and potentially could share the implementation.
This EIP introduces a new opcode which did not exists previously. Already deployed contracts using this opcode could change their behaviour after this EIP.
5F-- successful execution, stack consist of a single item, set to zero
5F5F..5F(1024 times) -- successful execution, stack consists of 1024 items, all set to zero
5F5F..5F(1025 times) -- execution aborts due to out of stack
The authors are not aware of any impact on security. Note that jumpdest-analysis is unaffected, as
PUSH0 has no immediate data bytes.
Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.
Adopted by projects
Not miss a beat of EIPs' update?
Subscribe EIPs Fun to receive the latest updates of EIPs Good for Buidlers to follow up.View all